IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Payton Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey 87's EHLP 39 16 13 29 0.744 0.0483 0.0514 0.1675 0.1781
2019-20 New Jersey 87's EHLP 38 18 22 40 1.053 0.0684 0.0684 0.2370 0.2370
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 23 4 2 6 0.261 0.0382 0.0382 0.1279 0.1279
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 46 7 19 26 0.565 0.0827 0.0822 0.2771 0.2755
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 23 2 6 8 0.348
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 21 4 3 7 0.333
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34035
Forward overall
#1845
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Fudger
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Heinold
New England · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Morin
Curry · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.