← New Search ↗ Social Card

Collin Heinold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-12-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 21 1 4 5 0.238 0.0917 0.0923 0.3465 0.3488
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 46 8 17 25 0.543 0.2216 0.2140 0.4369 0.4220
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE 30 6 15 21 0.700
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE 27 3 11 14 0.519
2020-21 University of New England D1 CNE SO 4 0 2 2 0.500
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE SO 4 0 2 2 0.500
2019-20 University of New England D1 CNE FR 14 1 6 7 0.500
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE FR 14 1 6 7 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · University of New England
+220.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5354
Defenseman overall
#1164
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.767 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.