IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Boisvert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-12-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 5 5 10 0.213 0.0267 0.0282 0.0672 0.0710
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 29 5 12 17 0.586 0.0767 0.0776 0.1990 0.2014
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 39 5 12 17 0.436 0.1007 0.0986 0.2133 0.2089
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 8 9 0.375
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 25 2 9 11 0.440
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D1 SUNYAC FR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 25 4 9 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2019-20 · SUNY Morrisville
+511.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
5%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11689
Defenseman overall
#1978
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase DiBari
Bethel · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Hefty
Concordia · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lubczuk
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.