IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase DiBari Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 28 6 9 15 0.536 0.0682 0.0721 — —
2016-17 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 30 5 10 15 0.500 0.0637 0.0641 0.1582 0.1592
2017-18 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 43 22 23 45 1.046 0.1333 0.1274 0.3310 0.3164
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC FR 15 2 1 3 0.200
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC — 15 2 1 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2018-19 · Bethel
+128.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32537
Forward overall
#1548
Forward born in 1997
#1275
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Litchke
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Techel
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Jewett
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.