IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Litchke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 35 3 6 9 0.257 0.0955 0.1019 0.2722 0.2903
2013-14 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 60 9 5 14 0.233 0.0866 0.0880 0.2470 0.2511
2014-15 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 59 12 12 24 0.407 0.1510 0.1456 0.4307 0.4152
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 27 4 9 13 0.481
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 27 12 12 24 0.889
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 29 15 5 20 0.690
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 27 8 13 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Superior
+641.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33982
Forward overall
#1406
Forward born in 1994
#4231
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Wisely
Hamline · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Oddleifson
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Klippenstein
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.