IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Micky Knox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 55 15 15 30 0.545 0.2004 0.2031 0.5758 0.5836
2010-11 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 57 20 23 43 0.754 0.2772 0.2668 0.7963 0.7665
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 14 2 4 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stout
+107.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19210
Forward overall
#759
Forward born in 1990
#1209
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Tolan
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Kane
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.