IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Bauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hastings USHS-MN 27 4 12 16 0.593 0.1595 0.1595 0.1439 0.1439
2020-21 Hastings USHS-MN 18 9 12 21 1.167 0.3141 0.3141 0.2834 0.2834
2021-22 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 42 24 32 56 1.333 0.1607 0.1614 — —
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 53 9 17 26 0.491 0.1822 0.1770 0.5194 0.5047
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 5 0 3 3 0.600
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19512
Forward overall
#742
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Shaheen
Hobart · 2014-15
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.