IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Berg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 39 12 17 29 0.744 0.2617 0.2671 0.3646 0.3722
2019-20 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 31 8 17 25 0.806 0.2838 0.2838 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA JR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
2020-21 Trine D1 — FR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18266
Forward overall
#880
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristan Mock
Becker · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Muise
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Sinclair
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.