IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Fasig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Taft NE-Prep 22 7 10 17 0.773 0.1531 0.1531 0.3520 0.3520
2019-20 Taft NE-Prep 25 8 11 19 0.760 0.1506 0.1506 0.3463 0.3463
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 56 15 11 26 0.464 0.1706 0.1706 0.4901 0.4901
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 58 10 24 34 0.586 0.2154 0.2078 0.6187 0.5970
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 6 15 21 0.677
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 29 5 6 11 0.379
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 26 8 15 23 0.885
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 27 3 8 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2022-23 · Hobart
+157.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25965
Forward overall
#1320
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Baldillez
Norwich · 2013-14
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Anastasio
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.