IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Kincaid Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 18 3 4 7 0.389 0.1290 0.1443 0.3604 0.4031
2019-20 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 50 2 23 25 0.500 0.1659 0.1659 0.4634 0.4634
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 26 1 10 11 0.423 0.1676 0.1676 0.4442 0.4442
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 53 12 31 43 0.811 0.2692 0.2618 0.7519 0.7314
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 33 4 11 15 0.455
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA JR 18 2 1 3 0.167
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5884
Defenseman overall
#1487
Defenseman born in 2002
#938
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Nelson
Lake Forest · 2013-14
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenny Matheson
Hamilton · 2010-11
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.