← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 55 1 15 16 0.291 0.1069 0.1149 0.3070 0.3301
2018-19 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0681 0.0676 0.3466 0.3440
2019-20 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 46 1 5 6 0.130 0.0769 0.0769 0.3916 0.3916
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA SR 38 2 7 9 0.237
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA JR 32 1 2 3 0.094
2021-22 Air Force D1 AHA SO 36 1 3 4 0.111
2020-21 Air Force D1 AHA FR 14 0 3 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2020-21 · Air Force
+162.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21014
Defenseman overall
#3103
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2022-23
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2013-14
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.