IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luka Sukovic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — NAHL 49 11 17 28 0.571 0.2099 0.2243 0.6031 0.6445
2022-23 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 31 8 5 13 0.419 0.1407 0.1403 0.3881 0.3871
2023-24 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 57 35 32 67 1.175 0.3942 0.3746 1.0877 1.0336
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 36 3 14 17 0.472
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 36 7 9 16 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2024-25 · Clarkson
+84.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19793
Forward overall
#1024
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Klugerman
Concordia · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.