IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kristaps Skrastins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-20 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HK Riga MHL-RU 46 14 15 29 0.630 0.4236 0.4236 1.4160 1.4160
2021-22 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 58 36 34 70 1.207 0.4782 0.4642 1.2671 1.2299
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 34 3 6 9 0.265
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 32 3 3 6 0.188
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 35 5 7 12 0.343
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 26 3 3 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · New Hampshire
-41.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6674
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2011-12
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.