IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Bergsland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fargo Force USHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.1475 0.1545 0.7509 0.7864
2019-20 Fargo Force USHL 35 0 1 1 0.029 0.0169 0.0169 0.0859 0.0859
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 54 5 28 33 0.611 0.2245 0.2245 0.6450 0.6450
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 4 20 24 0.667
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 36 5 21 26 0.722
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 40 1 9 10 0.250
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 40 4 7 11 0.275
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2021-22 · Colgate
+88.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10604
Defenseman overall
#1982
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Ring
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Toby Sengvongxay
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.