IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Potter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 30 4 6 10 0.333 0.1858 0.1858 0.2695 0.2695
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 58 3 23 26 0.448 0.1776 0.1854 0.4707 0.4914
2022-23 — NAHL 50 8 36 44 0.880 0.3487 0.3469 0.9239 0.9190
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 32 4 6 10 0.312
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 — — 18 2 3 5 0.278
2023-24 Union D1 ECAC — 21 0 3 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Union
-46.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4148
Defenseman overall
#1047
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Fallon
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.