IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Bulger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 56 16 9 25 0.446 0.1640 0.1650 0.4712 0.4740
2022-23 — NAHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.0955 0.0914 0.2744 0.2626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 28 22 23 45 1.607
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 28 22 23 45 1.607
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 28 22 23 45 1.607
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 28 22 23 45 1.607
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 28 22 23 45 1.607
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 28 22 23 45 1.607

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39543
Forward overall
#2461
Forward born in 2002
#4175
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Horn
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Bitz
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2018-19
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.