← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnetonka USHS-MN 27 6 9 15 0.556 0.1496 0.1496 0.1350 0.1350
2020-21 Minnetonka USHS-MN 20 10 13 23 1.150 0.3096 0.3096 0.2793 0.2793
2021-22 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 46 10 15 25 0.543 0.2153 0.2255 0.5706 0.5977
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.0904 0.0902 0.2395 0.2391
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 57 16 43 59 1.035 0.4101 0.3898 1.0868 1.0330
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC 25 9 13 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2024-25 · Augsburg
+280.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19438
Forward overall
#998
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.