← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colby Seitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 44 18 18 36 0.818 0.2286 0.2286 0.5646 0.5646
2021-22 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 54 12 10 22 0.407 0.1513 0.1455 0.4314 0.4148
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 27 4 15 19 0.704
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 25 10 16 26 1.040
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 29 13 19 32 1.103
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 23 7 15 22 0.957
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2022-23 · SUNY Cortland
+668.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22429
Forward overall
#819
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2016-17
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.