IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Sedlak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 45 10 7 17 0.378 0.1342 0.1369 0.3967 0.4048
2022-23 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 22 27 49 0.831 0.2950 0.2865 0.8719 0.8468
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC GR 23 6 9 15 0.652
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 30 6 15 21 0.700
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2023-24 · Trinity
+260.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20478
Forward overall
#1107
Forward born in 2002
#1354
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Felan
Lawrence · 2014-15
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2014-15
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.