| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Kent School | NE-Prep | 26 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.654 | 0.1255 | 0.1255 | 0.2979 | 0.2979 |
| 2020-21 | Kent School | NE-Prep | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1.400 | 0.2688 | 0.2688 | 0.6378 | 0.6378 |
| 2021-22 | Chippewa Steel | NAHL | 30 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 0.533 | 0.1895 | 0.1972 | 0.5625 | 0.5852 |
| 2022-23 | — | NAHL | 52 | 13 | 24 | 37 | 0.712 | 0.2528 | 0.2506 | 0.7505 | 0.7440 |
| 2023-24 | Northeast Generals | NAHL | 60 | 24 | 30 | 54 | 0.900 | 0.3198 | 0.3017 | 0.9493 | 0.8957 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hobart | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 7 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.857 |
| 2024-25 | Hobart | D3 | SUNYAC | — | 11 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.636 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.