← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Remick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kent School NE-Prep 26 7 10 17 0.654 0.1255 0.1255 0.2979 0.2979
2020-21 Kent School NE-Prep 5 4 3 7 1.400 0.2688 0.2688 0.6378 0.6378
2021-22 Chippewa Steel NAHL 30 8 8 16 0.533 0.1895 0.1972 0.5625 0.5852
2022-23 NAHL 52 13 24 37 0.712 0.2528 0.2506 0.7505 0.7440
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 60 24 30 54 0.900 0.3198 0.3017 0.9493 0.8957
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 7 2 4 6 0.857
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 11 4 3 7 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2024-25 · Hobart
+164.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16018
Forward overall
#786
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.