IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simone Dadiè Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-18 Country: Italy
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 32 7 6 13 0.406 0.1492 0.1584 0.4293 0.4559
2022-23 Houston Bulls NAHL 57 13 22 35 0.614 0.2256 0.2285 0.6489 0.6572
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 31 13 20 33 1.065 0.4102 0.3879 1.5482 1.4639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC — 37 3 3 6 0.162
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC — 31 5 2 7 0.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2024-25 · Colgate
-18.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21323
Forward overall
#1114
Forward born in 2003
#1480
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Weber
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Van Natter
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.