← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Harvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0241 0.0268 0.0860 0.0957
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 20 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 24 3 15 18 0.750 0.1097 0.1097 0.3677 0.3677
2021-22 Cornwall Colts CCHL 28 1 9 10 0.357 0.0775 0.0745 0.2764 0.2656
2022-23 Brockville Braves CCHL 16 2 9 11 0.688 0.1491 0.1366 0.5322 0.4875
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 28 2 3 5 0.179
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 25 4 1 5 0.200
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 22 1 2 3 0.136
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Norwich
+324.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8683
Defenseman overall
#1959
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.