IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richard Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NAHL 43 4 2 6 0.140 0.0496 0.0489 0.1465 0.1445
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC GR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 24 6 6 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Bowdoin
+1093.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23419
Forward overall
#1299
Forward born in 2002
#1758
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Hartviksen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Dvorak
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Toscano
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.