← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Horbach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Madison Capitols USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1537 0.1695 0.7366 0.8125
2019-20 Madison Capitols USHL 47 3 10 13 0.277 0.1700 0.1700 0.8149 0.8149
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 46 8 6 14 0.304 0.1871 0.1871 0.8965 0.8965
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 49 8 25 33 0.673 0.4140 0.3943 1.9843 1.8900
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 39 3 5 8 0.205
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 35 3 6 9 0.257
2023-24 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 38 6 8 14 0.368
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 32 4 4 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Wisconsin
-4.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17015
Forward overall
#906
Forward born in 2002
#1703
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.