← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Villegas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0983 0.1025 0.5007 0.5222
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 54 15 25 40 0.741 0.2721 0.2721 0.7818 0.7818
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 42 8 9 17 0.405 0.2388 0.2388 1.2158 1.2158
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC SR 36 7 22 29 0.806
2023-24 Union D1 ECAC JR 37 12 18 30 0.811
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC SO 34 7 6 13 0.382
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC FR 32 3 5 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2021-22 · Union
+185.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22123
Forward overall
#1083
Forward born in 2001
#2159
in USHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.