IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Kowalsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Express Hockey Club EHL 28 2 10 12 0.429 0.0990 0.1040 — —
2022-23 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 12 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 2 5 7 0.219
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 2 5 7 0.219
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 2 5 7 0.219
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 2 5 7 0.219
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 2 5 7 0.219
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 2 5 7 0.219

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18864
Defenseman overall
#3270
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.