← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Biraben Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 53 4 11 15 0.283 0.0694 0.0694 0.1937 0.1937
2020-21 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Aurora Tigers OJHL 51 22 30 52 1.020 0.2499 0.2498 0.6979 0.6977
2022-23 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 56 14 27 41 0.732 0.2600 0.2537 0.7686 0.7501
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC GR 30 10 16 26 0.867
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 29 5 13 18 0.621
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 26 5 11 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2023-24 · Hamilton
+185.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21284
Forward overall
#1160
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
3.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.