IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 44 6 10 16 0.364 0.1441 0.1439 0.3817 0.3813
2023-24 Janesville Jets NAHL 28 2 21 23 0.821 0.3254 0.3095 0.8624 0.8202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA — 28 1 3 4 0.143
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA — 29 0 1 1 0.035
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2024-25 · RIT
-85.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4334
Defenseman overall
#1095
Defenseman born in 2003
#1462
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.