← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Willis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-11 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lakeville South USHS-MN 23 4 18 22 0.957 0.2575 0.2575 0.2323 0.2323
2021-22 Lakeville South USHS-MN 30 14 29 43 1.433 0.3858 0.3858 0.3481 0.3481
2022-23 Chippewa Steel NAHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1189 0.1283 0.3150 0.3398
2023-24 Chippewa Steel NAHL 59 12 15 27 0.458 0.1813 0.1869 0.4804 0.4952
2024-25 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1862 0.1790 0.7286 0.7003
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA FR 34 3 7 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Air Force
+88.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33301
Forward overall
#1991
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.