← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Itagaki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lincoln Stars USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Janesville Jets NAHL 34 4 8 12 0.353 0.1297 0.1297 0.3725 0.3725
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 39 11 20 31 0.795 0.2920 0.2920 0.8390 0.8390
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 27 34 61 1.130 0.4352 0.4256 1.6439 1.6075
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 28 6 12 18 0.643
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA 26 2 7 9 0.346
2023-24 Army D1 AHA 34 6 19 25 0.735
2022-23 Army D1 AHA 37 4 29 33 0.892
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2022-23 · Army
+144.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13941
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2023-24
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.