IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Kingery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake USHS-MN 18 0 2 2 0.111 0.0141 0.0141 0.0270 0.0270
2020-21 Prior Lake USHS-MN 18 6 6 12 0.667 0.0844 0.0844 0.1619 0.1619
2021-22 Prior Lake USHS-MN 31 10 8 18 0.581 0.0735 0.0735 0.1410 0.1410
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0843 0.2345 0.2424
2023-24 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 45 5 10 15 0.333 0.1359 0.1333 0.2679 0.2627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32410
Forward overall
#1953
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Markus Andrews
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Benshadle
Trinity · 2015-16
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Wentland
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2008-09
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.