IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anton Sorensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 7 1 3 4 0.571 0.0645 0.0645 0.1944 0.1944
2021-22 Merritt Centennials BCHL 52 2 6 8 0.154 0.0593 0.0592 0.2241 0.2238
2022-23 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 53 18 36 54 1.019 0.2210 0.2104 0.7887 0.7508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA GR 12 3 5 8 0.667
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 9 1 1 2 0.222
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Adrian
+73.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25905
Forward overall
#1464
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Timothy Weinstein
Trinity · 2016-17
3.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.