IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jett Otwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 — NAHL 57 7 14 21 0.368 0.1354 0.1377 0.3894 0.3959
2024-25 — NAHL 55 14 16 30 0.545 0.2004 0.1932 0.5765 0.5559
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE FR 20 6 8 14 0.700
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2025-26 · Curry
+378.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30425
Forward overall
#1796
Forward born in 2004
#2741
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Skelly
New England College · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Fahlstedt
Salem State · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2004-05
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.