| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 46 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.217 | 0.1336 | 0.1336 | 0.6405 | 0.6405 |
| 2020-21 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 38 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.289 | 0.1780 | 0.1780 | 0.8529 | 0.8529 |
| 2021-22 | — | USHL | 57 | 9 | 37 | 46 | 0.807 | 0.4961 | 0.4796 | 2.3776 | 2.2983 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 37 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.540 |
| 2025-26 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SR | 37 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.540 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | JR | 37 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 0.703 |
| 2023-24 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | SO | 38 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 0.421 |
| 2022-23 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | FR | 38 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.447 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.