IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Doolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 25 0 4 4 0.160 0.0309 0.0309 0.0732 0.0732
2022-23 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 5 6 11 0.367 0.0707 0.0707 0.1678 0.1678
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 52 7 10 17 0.327 0.1161 0.1151 0.3432 0.3402
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 29 3 10 13 0.448
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 17 1 4 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Hobart
+220.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16651
Defenseman overall
#3115
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Olevitz
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roope Tuomioksa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex D'Oliveira
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.