icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Georgetown Raiders | OJHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Georgetown Raiders | OJHL | 42 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.167 | 0.0409 | 0.0430 | 0.1148 | 0.1207 |
| 2011-12 | Toronto Patriots | OJHL | 48 | 7 | 22 | 29 | 0.604 | 0.1481 | 0.1492 | 0.4160 | 0.4190 |
| 2012-13 | Toronto Patriots | OJHL | 55 | 7 | 40 | 47 | 0.855 | 0.2094 | 0.2004 | 0.5883 | 0.5632 |
| 2013-14 | Cobourg Cougars | OJHL | 53 | 8 | 40 | 48 | 0.906 | 0.2220 | 0.2012 | 0.6236 | 0.5651 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 18 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.167 |
| 2014-15 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.