IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Woolley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Apple Core EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 New York Apple Core EHL 31 4 12 16 0.516 0.1108 0.1102 0.2527 0.2513
2018-19 New York Apple Core EHL 39 20 18 38 0.974 0.2091 0.1974 0.4772 0.4506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 24 6 8 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2019-20 · Salem State
+319.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29469
Forward overall
#1252
Forward born in 1998
#570
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Timmy Nicksic
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Erick Ware
SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry Cleghorn
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.