← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Woolley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Apple Core EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 New York Apple Core EHL 31 4 12 16 0.516 0.1192 0.1185 0.2525 0.2511
2018-19 New York Apple Core EHL 39 20 18 38 0.974 0.2251 0.2125 0.4768 0.4502
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 MASCAC FR 24 6 8 14 0.583
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 24 6 8 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2019-20 · Salem State
+289.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22222
Forward overall
#1072
Forward born in 1998
#514
in EHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.