← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Yoon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Albert Lea USHS-MN 19 9 16 25 1.316 0.1621 0.1621 0.3195 0.3195
2021-22 Albert Lea USHS-MN 27 30 27 57 2.111 0.2601 0.2601 0.5126 0.5126
2022-23 Albert Lea USHS-MN 27 27 30 57 2.111 0.2601 0.2601 0.5126 0.5126
2023-24 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 4 8 12 0.250 0.0888 0.0936 0.2637 0.2778
2024-25 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 55 9 11 20 0.364 0.1292 0.1293 0.3835 0.3839
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 14 2 2 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Bethel
+190.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24435
Forward overall
#1374
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.