IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Happy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 41 8 17 25 0.610 0.1409 0.1482 0.2984 0.3138
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 40 13 28 41 1.025 0.2368 0.2386 0.5015 0.5053
2016-17 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 48 16 28 44 0.917 0.2118 0.2038 0.4485 0.4316
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast — 24 3 6 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2017-18 · Plymouth State
+82.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3078
Defenseman overall
#602
Defenseman born in 1996
#240
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brayden Kolisniak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
J.D. Speer
Neumann · 2022-23
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dragun
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.