IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Bowden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Elite 11 4 4 8 0.727 0.0542 0.0540 0.1666 0.1659
2023-24 Colorado Grit NAHL 55 2 4 6 0.109 0.0388 0.0390 0.1145 0.1150
2024-25 Colorado Grit NAHL 49 0 2 2 0.041 0.0145 0.0138 0.0428 0.0407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57357
Forward overall
#4117
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Cummings
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Burke
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Kessler
Hamline · 2013-14
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.