IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Ondos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 NMH NE-Prep 28 14 10 24 0.857 0.1698 0.1698 0.3905 0.3905
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 48 11 13 24 0.500 0.2039 0.2060 — —
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 53 16 19 35 0.660 0.2692 0.2600 0.5308 0.5127
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 26 6 14 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2025-26 · Suffolk
+276.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13082
Forward overall
#603
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Melso
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Stubbs
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2006-07
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.