← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duke Gentzler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-20 Country: USA
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 1 8 9 0.321 0.0637 0.0637 0.1464 0.1464
2023-24 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 6 6 12 0.462 0.0914 0.0914 0.2103 0.2103
2024-25 NAHL 51 15 21 36 0.706 0.2593 0.2626 0.7451 0.7547
2025-26 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 54 9 15 24 0.444 0.1633 0.1574 0.4691 0.4521
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28117
Forward overall
#1642
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2021-22
0.14
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.