IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack MacDonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-16 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
St. Francis Xavier Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — NCDC 42 9 8 17 0.405 0.1650 0.1686 0.3254 0.3326
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 50 17 16 33 0.660 0.2425 0.2364 0.6966 0.6791
2025-26 St. Francis Xavier Univ. USports-M 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 31 6 4 10 0.323
2023-24 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 28 4 7 11 0.393

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20479
Forward overall
#1103
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ludvig Steenberg
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.