IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Aucoin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 54 13 19 32 0.593 0.1988 0.2093 0.5484 0.5774
2023-24 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 57 32 31 63 1.105 0.3707 0.3728 1.0228 1.0287
2024-25 — NAHL 47 11 16 27 0.575 0.2111 0.2058 0.6064 0.5911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 26 17 9 26 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2025-26 · Southern Maine
+328.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19604
Forward overall
#1023
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cayden Kraus
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Vassos
Bowdoin · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.