← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cayden Kraus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 45 8 9 17 0.378 0.1456 0.1618 0.5498 0.6108
2016-17 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 58 15 9 24 0.414 0.1594 0.1689 0.6022 0.6383
2017-18 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 31 7 8 15 0.484 0.1623 0.1625 0.4478 0.4484
2018-19 AJHL 48 16 18 34 0.708 0.2376 0.2264 0.6555 0.6246
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 16 0 2 2 0.125
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 16 6 7 13 0.812
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE FR 18 8 7 15 0.833
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 18 8 7 15 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2019-20 · Salve Regina
+384.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31223
Forward overall
#1671
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2014-15
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2003-04
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.