IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Herman Åsberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-10 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Almtuna IS · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0282 0.0300 0.0970 0.1033
2022-23 — SHL-J20 33 4 9 13 0.394 0.2189 0.2226 0.5248 0.5337
2023-24 Almtuna IS U20 SuperElit 39 2 6 8 0.205 0.0809 0.0783 0.2785 0.2696
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 42 5 11 16 0.381 0.1400 0.1352 0.4021 0.3883
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE FR 24 1 3 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Nichols
+73.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41841
Forward overall
#2740
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Haines
SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Holmers
Aurora · 2017-18
1.053 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Lund
Adrian · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.