IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Haines Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-09-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 39 2 10 12 0.308 0.0889 0.0941 0.2316 0.2451
2006-07 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 49 7 14 21 0.429 0.1238 0.1245 0.3227 0.3244
2007-08 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 57 4 23 27 0.474 0.1369 0.1305 0.3566 0.3399
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Lake Superior State D1 — SR 40 6 17 23 0.575
2010-11 Lake Superior State D1 — JR 39 4 6 10 0.256
2009-10 Lake Superior State D1 — SO 30 1 4 5 0.167
2008-09 Lake Superior State D1 — FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2008-09 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 11 4 5 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2008-09 · Lake Superior State
+32.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9633
Defenseman overall
#1250
Defenseman born in 1987
#1316
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Riddell
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Reif
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Rivait
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.