← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jan Gaspar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-18 Country: Czechia
Signed Professionally
Södertälje SK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Mountfield HK U20 USHL-Style-Czech 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 33 4 6 10 0.303 0.1196 0.1275 0.4115 0.4388
2022-23 Södertälje SK U20 SHL-J20 31 3 11 14 0.452 0.2510 0.2555 0.6017 0.6126
2023-24 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 44 8 22 30 0.682 0.2690 0.2607 0.9260 0.8976
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 29 3 8 11 0.379 0.1394 0.1348 0.4004 0.3871
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2025-26 · Bentley
-51.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21358
Forward overall
#1163
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2017-18
1.053 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.