IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Russo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Governors Academy NE-Prep 28 9 4 13 0.464 0.0896 0.0896 0.2125 0.2125
2022-23 Governors Academy NE-Prep 27 10 12 22 0.815 0.1572 0.1572 0.3729 0.3729
2023-24 Governors Academy NE-Prep 26 14 10 24 0.923 0.1781 0.1781 0.4224 0.4224
2024-25 — BCHL 53 9 15 24 0.453 0.1745 0.1675 0.6598 0.6334
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26359
Forward overall
#1500
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Parks
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Gervais
Neumann · 2008-09
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Crawford
Adrian · 2008-09
0.562 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.