← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tootoo Fotheringham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Winnipeg Monarchs MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0321 0.0329 0.1051 0.1077
2023-24 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 46 3 20 23 0.500 0.0628 0.0614 0.1578 0.1543
2024-25 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 46 1 7 8 0.174 0.0335 0.0307 0.1097 0.1006
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Southern New Hampshire
+252.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22567
Defenseman overall
#3751
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2024-25
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.